Penghapusan Merek Terkenal Karena Tidak Digunakan: Analisis Yuridis Normatif Terhadap Putusan Mahkamah Agung Nomor 264 K/Pdt.Sus-Hki/2015
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.63477/jols.v3i4.654Keywords:
Famous Brand, Brand Removal, Bad Faith, IKEA, Legal CertaintyAbstract
Indonesia’s trademark legal system brings together the protection of well-known marks and the cancellation of trademarks due to non-use for three consecutive years. This study analyzes the conformity of the judges’ considerations in Supreme Court Decision No. 264 K/Pdt.Sus-HKI/2015 with Article 6 paragraph (1) letter b and Article 61 paragraph (2) letter a of Law No. 15 of 2001 on Trademarks, as well as its implications for legal certainty. This study employs a normative legal research method using statutory and case approaches, based on laws and regulations and court decisions analyzed descriptively and qualitatively through legal deduction. The results show that the cancellation of the IKEA trademark was applied through a textual-formalistic approach without adequate consideration of its status as a well-known mark and the alleged bad faith of the local registrant, thereby being inconsistent with the principles of Article 6bis of the Paris Convention. This study recommends that judges balance the provisions on non-use cancellation with the protection of well-known marks and the assessment of good faith in order to ensure legal certainty.
Downloads
References
Alfarizi, M. (2021). Penerapan prinsip-prinsip perlindungan hukum merek terkenal Konvensi Paris ke dalam Undang-Undang Nomor 20 Tahun 2016 tentang Merek dan Indikasi Geografis. Literacy, 3(1), 46–70.
Amanah, N. (2018). Analisis Putusan Mahkamah Agung Nomor 264k/Pdt. Sus-HKI/2015 tentang Sengketa Merek IKEA Antara Inter IKEA System BV Dan PT. Ratania Katulistiwa Hubungannya Dengan Pasal 6 Ayat (1) Undang-Undang No. 15 Tahun 2001 Tentang Merek. UIN Sunan Gunung Djati Bandung.
Far-Far, C. Y. (2014). Tinjauan yuridis pembatalan merek dagang terdaftar terkait prinsip itikad baik (good faith) dalam sistem pendaftaran merek (Studi Putusan Nomor 356 K/Pdt. Sus-HaKI/2013). Brawijaya University.
Karina, R. M. P., & Njatrijani, R. (2019). Perlindungan Hukum Bagi Pemegang Hak Merek Dagang Ikea Atas Penghapusan Merek Dagang. Jurnal Pembangunan Hukum Indonesia, 1(2), 194–212.
Mahkamah Agung Republik Indonesia. (2015). Putusan Mahkamah Agung Republik Indonesia Nomor 264 K/Pdt.Sus-HKI/2015, Inter IKEA System B.V. melawan PT Ratania Khatulistiwa, dkk.
Mamahit, J. (2013). Perlindungan hukum atas merek dalam perdagangan barang dan jasa. Lex Privatum, 1(3), 90–100.
Organization, W. I. P. (1967). Paris Convention for the Protection of Industrial Property, as revised at Stockholm on July 14, 1967.
Pengadilan Niaga pada Pengadilan Negeri Jakarta Pusat. (2014). Putusan Nomor 99/PDT.SUS-MEREK/2013/PN.Niaga.Jkt.Pst.
Pratama, R. R., & Roisah, K. (2025). Hubungan Hukum Terhadap Kepemilikan Hak Cipta Yang Dijadikan Merek Bagi Pencipta Dan Pemegang Merek. Jurnal USM Law Review, 8(1), 65–85.
Purnamasari, I. (2018). Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Merek Terkenal Di Indonesia (Studi Kasus Putusan MA NOMOR 264K/PDT. SUS-HKI/2015). Jurnal Ilmu Hukum: ALETHEA, 2(1), 1–16.
Republik Indonesia. (1994). Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 7 Tahun 1994 tentang Pengesahan Agreement Establishing the World Trade Organization. Lembaran Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 1994 Nomor 57.
Republik Indonesia. (1997). Keputusan Presiden Republik Indonesia Nomor 15 Tahun 1997 tentang Perubahan Keputusan Presiden Nomor 24 Tahun 1979 tentang Pengesahan Paris Convention for the Protection of Industrial Property dan Convention Establishing the World Intellectual Property Organization.
Republik Indonesia. (2001). Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 15 Tahun 2001 tentang Merek.
Republik Indonesia. (2016). Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 20 Tahun 2016 tentang Merek dan Indikasi Geografis. Lembaran Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 2016 Nomor 252, Tambahan Lembaran Negara Republik Indonesia Nomor 5953.
Semaun, S. (2016). Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Merek Perdagangan Barang Dan Jasa. DIKTUM: Jurnal Syariah Dan Hukum, 14(1), 108–124.
World Trade Organization. (1994). Agreement on Trade-Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights (TRIPS Agreement). Annex 1C of the Marrakesh Agreement Establishing the World Trade Organization.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Andreansyah Andreansyah, Hendi Sastra Putra, Sinung Mufti Hangabei, Mikho Ardinata
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
